It's no secret to anyone that I was not particularly impressed with the new catstevens.com. To paraphrase myself I said it was nothing more than an online brochure to promote the new album, and that the navigation was so annoying that after a couple visits everyone would hate it. What's more I felt that the content offering was so insignificant (when you could even find it) that there would be no reason to ever really go back to the site once you'd seen it once. In the interest of full disclosure, I said some other things too, which I now regret and later retracted. But having said all of that, now that the new site has been up for over a month, how do I feel about it?
I was right.
If I could have made a list of everything not to do when designing the new catstevens.com it would be a perfect description of what they actually did. I'm not joking. It's a slick online-brochure to promote album sales that is quickly annoying, hard to use, impossibly non-accessible, incredibly slow and devoid of any soul or community. What's more, it's not even a "web site." The entire thing is a single Flash .swf file, which appears to do some call-outs to display the news and other "dynamic" content. It's also 1.5 megabytes, which is unbelievably large. I can't even begin to imagine what it must be like accessing the site for a dial-up modem user. Ouch!
So when I say it's "not even a web site" what do I mean? I think it's easiest to explain by giving an example. You see, contrary to what some "Mes Amis" would like to believe, I happen to like Yusuf and am a fan of his work. I would like to keep up-to-date on the latest news and am really curious about his touring plans, and how well the album sells. The obvious way to do that is to visit the site every so often and read the news. This is where the problem comes in.
I decided to time how long it took to load catstevens.com and click on the news link before I actually was able to see the latest stories. Admittedly this is totally unscientific, I just started and stopped a stop-watch, but I think it's fairly accurate.
It took over 17 seconds.
It's important to note that I already had the 1.5 megabyte Flash .swf file cached in my browser, so the 17 seconds doesn't include download time. It is only the amount of time it took for the "Loading" screen to finish, for me to click on News, for the animation to do it's thing and the stories to finally appear. Heaven forbid I clicked on "Sing" and read the news there. I didn't bother to time how long that would take.
So in fairness I decided to time how long it took to load the home page of dashing.com and begin reading the latest stories. I could have just as easily picked any "real" web site for this, but it just seemed to make sense to use dashing. So the results?
0.335 seconds.
Ok, so I rest my case.
This could all be mitigated somewhat of course if I simply bookmarked the "News" section on catstevens.com and went straight there. But you see there's that pesky problem of it not being a web site. You can't bookmark any pages, because it doesn't have any (save the home page itself). Web sites that employ Flash in that manner effectively break the very things that make the web the web. You can't bookmark them, you can't search them and they are unaccessible to blind or similarly disabled people. It gets worse when you factor in that there's no way to skip the annoying animations, and don't get me started on the sound effects.
Now, I really don't want to not like catstevens.com, honest. I wanted to love it. I had so hoped that it would be great. But unfortunately it just isn't.
I do want everyone to know, whether you love the new site or hate it, that I tried my very best to push them in the right direction. I was very clear about what I thought they should do and told them so. Obviously they didn't agree with me. I just wish that not agreeing with me didn't translate to waiting nearly half a minute to read the news.
P.S. Would you like your very own copy of the new catstevens.com? Since it's just a Flash file you can download and save it to your computer. Right (or control-click) here and choose save. Then take the saved Flash file and drop it in your browser window. Fun for the whole family!
P.P.S. I never tried this on Windows, but I assume it should work the same as on my Mac.
P.P.P.S. That link is to their site, not dashing.com. I'm not hosting that file, just pointing you to it.
P.P.P.P.S. This could go on forever.
P.P.P.P.P.S. Alright, that's enough! Stop it!

10 responses to It's Not How It Looks, It's How It Works
we told you so.
ok, someone had to say it.
Well you tried Big Guy and that is all that anyone could ask. *hug* I love this site, but one of these days I have to make it my task to get the chatroom hopping again. just been so busy lately....... IRIE ~Fe~
I'm wondering if Yusuf really owns cs.com now or does Polydor now own it? Underneath the spinning cup it says: "copyright 2006, Polydor Records Ltd. All rights reserved." Wonder if that is referring to the site? Or is it referring to the album???
I agree John, the site is so slow that it is just not worth going there, and when you get there - nothing much is there!! Also, they do not post the new news to the site very frequently. "YI.org.uk" was run much better than the new cs.com, so it doesn't seem like those designers are responsible for the new cs.com.
Did you ever go to Polydor's web(flash?)site. It is worse!! Terribly slow and confusing. You click on a section and then you wait forever. That is why I'm wondering if the Polydor web designers designed Yusuf's site.
John, I miss your cs.com alot. It was such a great site. Thanks!
I'm sure the Polydor people designed it, or at least it wasn't Yusuf's people directly. But the same person(s) who ran yi.org.uk are in charge of the new site.
I looked at Polydor's site before and came to the conclusion that the spinning cup site is "their style". I also clicked on Pussycat Dolls and found out that the link redirects to an actual fan site. So maybe there really is a cs.com in the works and this poster paint site is just the brochure it seems to be.
I do have dial-up and I'm currently connected at 46.6 kbps on a 6 month old DELL desktop. Loading time for spinning cup to appear: 5 minutes even. Hatin' it.
kareema
That was my thought as well, kareema. That maybe there's another site yet in the works. 'Coz Majicat is known only as the *archive*.
Do you feel better now, John? After that rant? Even *I* feel better and I only READ it!
A little off the subject, but.. you got any more tidbits (like you intimated to us earlier? You know... juicy stories to tell us?)
John Gibbons you are the epidomy of class! I like what you have to say without putting anyone down! That's just classy!
I don't even attempt to look at stuff over there. I was turned off from the beginning... but I gotta say, I do like the little update bulletins and info on Yusuf's myspace ;o) I think I actually read that more.
you are absolutely right. I hope Yusuf's team would listen to you. Also I missed the old cs.com's community site, I would have been great if they kept it as part of the new website.
John, please let us know what will become of the old archives from catstevens.com? As Adam states "I missed the old cs.com's community site, I would have been great if they kept it as part of the new website"
Renaming the site and devoting it back to catstevens is a positive thing we would all very much appreciate. Remembering how great Catstevens.com was, and having a place for our songs and memories as well. And, I agree, you are a class act John! Thanks.